We accept:
01706 214 233
Best CPU for Gaming
Don't have an account?
Creating an account has many benefits: check out faster, keep more than one address, track orders and more.
Most buying advice tells you to spend your money on the graphics card and treat the processor as an afterthought. That is right often enough to be useful and wrong often enough to cost you.
This guide covers which processor to buy, but more importantly it covers when the processor is the thing actually limiting your frame rate, because that is the part nobody explains properly.
The short answer
For pure gaming in 2026, the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D is the best processor you can buy. It has been since it launched, and nothing has taken the title off it.
If that is more than you want to spend, the Ryzen 5 7500X3D or an Intel Core Ultra 5 will handle everything at a fraction of the price. If you do serious work as well as gaming, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K or the Ryzen 9 9950X3D make more sense.
Now the useful part.
When the processor is what is holding you back
The graphics card draws the picture. The processor works out what should be in it: where every character is, what the physics are doing, what the AI has decided, what the other players on the server are up to.
That means the processor sets a ceiling on how many frames can exist at all, and the graphics card decides how good each one looks. Push the resolution up and more of the work moves to the graphics card. Push the frame rate up, or fill the screen with things that need thinking about, and it moves to the processor.
Here is how that plays out in practice.
Competitive shooters are processor games
This surprises people, because they are not demanding to look at. That is exactly why. Run Valorant or Rainbow Six Siege at low settings on a 240Hz monitor and the graphics card is barely working. The processor has to produce 240 complete game states every second, and that is where the limit sits.
The same applies to Overwatch 2, Apex Legends and Warzone. If you are chasing a high refresh monitor, spend on the processor.
Simulation and strategy games are worse
These are the clearest case of all, because they get harder the longer you play. A city builder or a grand strategy game has to work out what thousands of individual things are doing, every turn or every frame, and most of that runs on a single core.
Cities: Skylines II is the standard example. A small town runs fine on anything. A city of 200,000 people does not, and no graphics card will fix it. Age of Empires IV runs its main game logic on one core by design. Total War campaigns slow down as they grow, and Microsoft Flight Simulator is one of the most processor-bound games on PC.
Crowded multiplayer
Escape from Tarkov is notoriously hard on processors. World of Warcraft is comfortable out in the world and falls over in a twenty-player raid. Baldur's Gate 3 struggles most in Act 3, where the city is at its busiest.
In every one of those cases the pattern is the same. Frame rate is fine until a lot of things need thinking about at once, then it drops. That is a processor limit, and it looks nothing like a graphics limit.
When the graphics card is the right answer
Play single-player games at 1440p or 4K with the settings turned up and the picture reverses. Cyberpunk 2077 with ray tracing, Black Myth: Wukong, Ghost of Tsushima. These are graphics card games, and a mid-range processor will not hold them back.
Most people play a mix, which is why the honest answer is balance rather than a rule.
What to buy
The best gaming processor: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
Eight cores, sixteen threads, and 96MB of L3 cache thanks to AMD's 3D V-Cache. That cache is the whole story. It lets the processor keep far more game data close to hand, which is exactly what helps in the situations described above.
It beats Intel's flagship by a substantial margin in gaming while costing less, and its 1% lows are excellent, which is the number that determines whether a game feels smooth rather than just fast on paper.
There is a refreshed version, the Ryzen 7 9850X3D, which is marginally quicker for meaningfully more money. The 9800X3D remains the sensible buy.
The best all-rounder: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
If your PC does more than play games, this is the better processor. Twenty-four cores, strong multi-threaded output, and it will chew through video editing, rendering and compiling far faster than the AMD chips.
For gaming alone it sits behind the X3D chips, and the gap widens in exactly the cache-sensitive titles listed above. If you stream, edit or render as well as play, that trade is worth making.
The best of both: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D
Sixteen cores with 3D V-Cache. It matches the 9800X3D in games and handles serious work as well. It is expensive, and it only makes sense if you genuinely need both.
The value pick: AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D or Intel Core Ultra 5
This is where most people should be looking. A Ryzen 5 with 3D V-Cache gives you the cache advantage that matters in games at a fraction of the flagship price, and Intel's Core Ultra 5 chips are strong performers with a lower platform cost.
Either will run every current game comfortably. Put the money you save into the graphics card.
The entry point: Intel Core i5 or AMD Ryzen 5
An i5 14400F or a Ryzen 5 7500F will handle 1080p gaming without complaint and leave budget for a better graphics card. There is no sense buying an expensive processor to pair with an entry-level GPU.
What actually matters in the specification
Cache matters more than people realise
This is the least understood number on the box and the most important one for gaming. Cache is very fast memory built into the processor itself. The more game data that fits in it, the less the processor has to wait around for system memory.
AMD's X3D chips stack extra cache underneath the die, which is why a 96MB eight-core chip beats a twenty-four core processor in games. It is not close, and it is entirely down to the cache.
Cores: six is the floor, eight is the sweet spot
Six cores runs everything. Eight is comfortable and gives you room for Discord, a browser and streaming software alongside the game.
Beyond eight, gaming gains fall away sharply. Sixteen cores is a productivity feature, not a gaming one. Buying more cores for gaming alone is money that would do more in the graphics card.
Clock speed: still relevant, less than it was
Clock speed only compares meaningfully within the same generation and architecture. A 4.5GHz chip from this year will comfortably beat a 5GHz chip from five years ago.
What matters is single-core speed, because the main thread in most games runs on one core. That is why strategy games in particular care about clock speed more than core count.
Threads, TDP and sockets
Threads let each core handle two instruction streams. Useful, but less decisive than the marketing suggests.
TDP tells you roughly how much heat the chip produces and therefore what cooling it needs. Worth noting that X3D chips are temperature sensitive: past around 85 degrees their boost clocks drop away quickly, so decent cooling is not optional on them.
The socket determines which motherboards fit. Current AMD chips use AM5, current Intel chips use LGA 1851. They are not interchangeable, and if you are upgrading rather than building, this is the first thing to check.
AMD or Intel?
For gaming, AMD. The X3D chips lead by a clear margin and have done for a while, and AM5 has a longer support history, which matters if you plan to upgrade the processor without replacing the motherboard.
For mixed use, Intel. The Core Ultra chips are stronger in productivity work, idle at lower power, and the platform is mature.
For value at the lower end, both are competitive and it comes down to what is priced well when you buy.
Match the processor to the graphics card
The most common mistake is buying two components that do not belong together. A flagship processor with an entry-level graphics card wastes money, and an expensive graphics card behind a weak processor never gets to stretch its legs.
Rough guide: for 1080p at high frame rates, weight the budget towards the processor. For 4K, weight it towards the graphics card. For 1440p, keep them balanced.
And be honest about what you play. If it is mostly competitive shooters, that is a processor purchase. If it is single-player games at 4K, it is a graphics card purchase.
Final Thoughts
The Ryzen 7 9800X3D is the best gaming processor available, and a Ryzen 5 or Core Ultra 5 is the right answer for most people.
But the more useful thing to take from this is knowing which side of the line your games sit on. If your frame rate drops when the map gets busy, when the raid starts, or when your city gets large, more graphics card will not help you. That is the processor, and that is the upgrade worth making.
Every machine we build is specified with that balance in mind. Browse the gaming PC range, or build your own with our online configurator.
Why not also read: CPU cores vs threads explained and how much RAM do I need for gaming.
